Descargar Información bibliográfica

•El valor diagnóstico de la Microscopía Electrónica de rutina para biopsias renales. Dr. J R Tighe y Dr. N F Jones, 1970
•Preparación de Tejido Renal incluido en EPON para escaneo por Microscopía Electrónica. Wing-Ling NG et al., 1982.
•Valor de la Microscopía Electrónica en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad renal. Pearson et al. 1993.
•Una Reevaluación de la Microscopía Electrónica de rutina en estudio de biopsias renales nativas. Mark Haas, 1996.
•Microscopía Electrónica en el estudio rutinario de biopsias de riñón nativo. Luis F. M.D.,Ph.D, 2006.
•Inmunohistoquímica y Microscopía Electrónica en la evaluación de biopsias de tejido renal. P N Furness y S Boyd, 1996.
•El rol de la Microscopía Electrónica en el diagnostico de glomerulopatías. Sementilli et al., 2004.
•Lo que debes saber acerca del procedimiento de una biopsia renal. Kerstin Amann y Christian S. Haas, 2006.

•Referencias
·Alport AC. Hereditary familial congenital haemorrhagic nephritis. Br Med J 1927; 1: 504.

·Andreucci VE, Fuiano G, Stanziale P, Andreucci M. Role of renal biopsy in the diagnosis and prognosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl 1998; 66: S91–S95

·Antonio Barat, Mar del Barrio Molina, Félix Manzarbeitia. Sinopsis de patología ultraestructural del glomérulo renal. REV ESP PATOL 2002; Vol 35, n.º 2: 151-166

·Ben-Bassat M, Stark H, Robson M, Rosenfeld J. Value of routine electron microscopy in the differential diagnosis of the nephrotic syndrome. Pathol Microbiol. 1974;41(1):26-40.

·Cameron JS. Indications for renal biospy, history of the procedure, and relationship of the findings to further investigation and treatment. In: Solez K, Racusen L, Olsen S, eds. Diagnostic Renal Pathology. Transpath Inc. (http://www.transpath.com/m-media/DRP.htm)

·Collan Y, Klockars M, Heino M. Revision of light microscopic kidney biopsy diagnosis in glomerular disease. Nephron. 1978;20(1):24-31.

·Corwin HL, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ. The importance of sample size in the interpretation of the renal biopsy. Am J Nephrol 1988; 8: 85–89

·Dische FE, Parsons V. Experience in the diagnosis of glomerulonephritis using combined light microscopical, ultrastructural and immunofluorescence techniques: an analysis of 134 cases. Histopathology. 1977;1(5):331-62.

·Fuiano G, Mazza G, Comi N et al. Current indications for renal biopsy: a questionnaire-based survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35: 448–457

·Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med. 1951;11(3):324-30

·Kimmelstiel P, Kim 0 J & Beres J (1962) Amer. J. clin.Path. 38, 280

·Marl Haas. A Reevaluation of Routine Electron Microscopy in the Examination of Native Renal Biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997; 8: 70-76,.

·McCarthy GP, Roberts IS. Diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection: evaluation of the Banff 97 Guidelines for Slide Preparation. Transplantation 2002; 73: 1518–1521

·Kerstin Amann y Christian S. Haas. What you should know about the work-up of a renal biopsy. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2006) 21: 1157–1161.

·Muehrcke RC, Mandal AK, Gotoff SP, Isaacs EW, Volini FI. The clinical value of electron microscopy in renal disease. Arch Intern Med 124: 170-176, 196

·Osterby R. Lessons from kidney biopsies. Diabetes Metab Rew. 1996;12(3):151-74.

·Olsen S, Bohman SO, Hestbech J, Gundersen HJG, Petersen VP, Deguchi N, Maunsbach AB. Ultrastructural lesions in light-microscopically defined types of glomerulonephritis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Inmunol Scand Sect A 91: 53-63, 1983

·Paone DB, Meyer LE. The effect of biopsy on therapy in renal disease. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141: 1039–1041

·Perkot GT, Stephens FE, Dolowitz DA, Tyler FH. A clinical study of hereditary interstitial pyelonephritis. Arch Intem Med 1951 ;88: 191.

·Pearson JM, McWilliam LJ, Coyne JD, Curry A. Value of electron microscopy in diagnosis of renal disease. J Clin Pathol 47: 126-128, 1994.

·P N Furness, S Boyd. Electron microscopy and immunocytochemistryin the assessment of renal biopsy specimens:actual and optimal practice. J Clin Pathol.1996;49:233-23

·Sementilli, Moura, Franco. The role of electron microscopy for the diagnosis of glomerulopathies. Sao Paulo Med J 2004; 122(3):104-109.

·Siegel NJ, Spargo BH, Kashgarian M, Hayslett JP. An evaluation of routine electron microscopy in the examination of renal biopsies. Nephron 10: 209-215, 1973

·Skjorten F, Halvorsen S. A study of the value of resin-embedded semi-thin sections and electron microscopy in the diagnosis of renal biopsies. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1981;89(4):257-62.

·Spargo BH. Practical use of electron microscopy for the diagnosis of glomerular disease. Hum Pathol. 1975;6(4):405-20.

·Taylor CR. Principles of immunomicroscopy. In: Immunomicroscopy. A diagnostic Tool for surgical pathologists. Mayor problems in Pathology. 3rd ed. New York: Saunders, 2006;pp:1-46.

·Tighe JR, Jones NE. The diagnostic value of routine electron microscopy of renal biopsies. Proc R Soc Med 63: 475-477, 1970.

·Theory and practice of histological techniques /edited by John D. Bancroft, Marilyn Gamble, London: Churchill Livingstone, 2002. Capítulo 32, Paginas 701-70.

·Thut MP, Uehlinger D, Steiger J, Mihatsch MJ. Renal biopsy: standard procedure of modern nephrology. Ther Umsch 2002; 59: 110–116.

·Wing-Ling NG, L MA, KF SO. Preparation of Epon-embedded renal tissue for scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Pathol 1982;35:1384-1387.